Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties.

By Laurie B. Hanich, Nancy C. Jordan, David Kaplan, J. Dick. 2001

392 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/128ae82f73a522680bf13118c1ef585ca184260c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Contributions of longitudinal studies to evolving definitions and knowledge of developmental dyscalculia (2013, background): “For instance, both fluency (timed arithmetic) and procedural (untimed calculation) difficulties characterize young children with DD, but while procedural difficulties diminish over time, fluency deficits persist [13,27,31,85] even to 8th grade [27].”
Developing Automaticity in Multiplication Facts: Integrating Strategy Instruction with Timed Practice Drills (2006, background): “Research on primarygrade students indicates that students with LD are more likely to rely on counting strategies than direct retrieval when working single-digit fact problems (Geary & Brown, 1991; Hanich, Jordan, Kaplan, & Dick, 2001; Hoard, Geary, & Hamson, 1999).”
Assistance of students with mathematical learning difficulties: how can research support practice? (2016, background): “Procedural problems occur in relation to fact retrieval and lead to the persistent use of (finger) counting strategies for easy computation problems (Andersson 2008; Hanich et al. 2001; Häsel-Weide et al. 2013; Ostad 1999).”
Explicitly Teaching for Transfer: Effects on the Mathematical Problem–Solving Performance of Students with Mathematics Disabilities (2002, background): “Prior work shows that this mathematics disability subtype suffers from more pervasive and serious mathematics deﬁcits than students with MD alone (e.g., Hanich et al., 2001; Jordan & Hanich, 2000).”
Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. (2007, methodology): “Compared with TA children, children with MLD rely on finger counting for more years, adopt the min procedure at a later age, and commit more counting errors (Geary, 1993; Hanich, Jordan, Kaplan, & Dick, 2001; Jordan & Montani, 1997; Ostad, 1997; Russell & Ginsberg, 1984).”
Effectiveness of mathematical word problem solving interventions for students with learning disabilities and/or mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. (2016, background): “In addition, word problem solving is inherently influenced by decoding and comprehension skills, so students with deficits in these areas also tend to struggle with word problems (e.g., Hanich et al., 2001; Jordan & Hanich, 2000).”
Numerical development: current issues and future perspectives (2005, background): “Likewise, the decoding and understanding of text problems crucially depend on intact receptive language abilities (e.g., Hanich et al., 2001).”
Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8-9-year-old students. (2004, background): “Hanich et al. (2001) found that " children with MD-only seem to be superior to children with MD/RD in areas that may be mediated by language but not in ones that rely on numerical magnitudes, visuospatial processing, and automaticity " .”
Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children's numerical knowledge through playing number board games. (2008, background): “A likely reason for the relation between arithmetic proficiency and linearity of numerical magnitude representations is that presentation of arithmetic problems activates not only a verbal representation of the correct answer but also an approximate magnitude representation ( Hanich, Jordan, Kaplan,”
Number skills and knowledge in children with specific language impairment (2005, background): “Tasks with multidigit numbers may be more problematic, as Hanich et al. (2001) found that children with either reading or math difficulties showed weakness in understanding the base-10 system.”