Reading Statistics and Research (5th ed.)

By T. Baumgartner. 2008

819 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fe9f7fac111aa66175a604027c409443356c909

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Sociology and Political Science

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Rater Experience, Rating Scale Length, and Judgments of L2 Pronunciation: Revisiting Research Conventions (2013, background): “Scale levels 4 and 5 are overshadowed by heavily overlapping adjacent levels, again leaving little assurance that speakers at the corresponding ability levels will be accurately assessed. Clearly, the categories in the midsection of all three 9-point scales are muddled, lending credence to Nov.R31.9”
Student Attitudes, Conceptions, and Achievement in Introductory Undergraduate College Statistics (2015, neutral): “Other researchers (delMas & Bart, 1987; Garfield, 1981; Garfield & Ahlgren, 1988; Huck, 2007; Kahneman & Tversky, 1972, 1973; Konold, 1991; Landwehr, 1989) have also identified student misconceptions.”
Understanding User Behavior Through Log Data and Analysis (2014, methodology): “Interpreting the metrics : In log analyses, it is standard practice to use confi dence intervals (Huck, 2011 ) rather than analysis of variance signifi cance testing, because the conditions are not organized into a factorial design with interaction terms, and because a confi dence interval gives…”
Selected Demographic Variables, School Music Participation, and Achievement Test Scores of Urban Middle School Students (2008, methodology): “Univariate analyses examining the areas of significance revealed by MANOVA procedures used the Bonferroni adjustment for four dependent variables to hold alpha levels at an omnibus level of .05 and control for Type I error (Huck, 2000).”
Development of the Heat and Energy Concept Inventory: Preliminary Results on the Prevalence and Persistence of Engineering Students' Misconceptions (2012, methodology): “Content validity, the degree to which the instrument covers the material that the instrument is supposed to cover (Huck & Cormier, 1996), was addressed in the development of the instrument by asking panels of engineering faculty who teach an undergraduate heat transfer course to critique whether…”
Two Criteria for Good Measurements in Research: Validity and Reliability (2017, neutral): “It is divided into two categories: i) convergent validity, and ii) discriminant validity [Huck, 2007].”
Evaluating Information Visualizations (2008, background): “There are many good references such as Huck [33].”
Academic buoyancy and psychological risk: Exploring reciprocal relationships ☆ (2013, methodology): “1 demonstrates that there are six possible relationships among T1 and T2 factors in a cross-lagged design (Huck et al., 1974).”
Teaching and Learning Color Consciousness in Black Families: Exploring Family Processes and Women’s Experiences With Colorism (2011, background): “Purposive sampling involves the development of “certain criteria established by the researcher” to serve the purpose of the research and the questions of the investigation (Huck, 2004, p. 109).”
Graphic Organizers Applied to Secondary Algebra Instruction for Students with Learning Disorders (2007, neutral): “The values for the Levene’s Statistics (Huck & Cormier, 1996) ranged from .14 to 1.00.”
Writing Instruction for Adolescents with Learning Disabilities: Programs of Intervention Research (2008, background): “Effect sizes for group studies were considered to be small (.20), medium (.50), or large (.80 or greater) as suggested by Cohen (Huck, 2000).”
Factors that Influence Mathematical Creativity (2019, background): “Huck (2012) suggests that instruments that have not been normed in the past seven years should undergo another round of validation.”
In search of quality: measuring Higher Education Service Quality (HiEduQual) (2019, methodology): “…0 to 1, and a value over .60 is deemed as acceptable and shows that the sample is fit for application of factor analysis technique (Pallant, 2011; Huck, 2012) as values below this would mean that the factor analysis will not be able to account for much of the variability in the data (Hinton,…”
Language learner beliefs and study abroad: A study on English as a lingua franca (ELF) (2014, methodology): “89, indicating strong reliability (Huck, 2004).”
Gender and Homework Management Reported by High School Students (2006, methodology): “Compared against the criteria recommended by Cohen for interpreting eta squared (.01 = small, .059 = medium, and .138 = large; cited in Huck, 2000), it appears that the most of the effect sizes found in this study were small (η2 ranged from .02 to .04), except for the significant gender difference…”
Connection, trust, and commitment: dimensions of co-creation? (2011, background): “Given the performance of the items, their face validity, content validity, the multiple-step process in scale development and refinement, as well as the documented pedigree of the scale items, the scale items were concluded to have demonstrated acceptable levels of reliability, as well as convergent”