WAREHOUSE OPERATIONS EMPLOYEES: LINKING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT, JOB SATISFACTION, AND COPING RESPONSES
By Chad W. Autry, P. Daugherty. 2003
151 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e9d972845d435e75d1572303ff1199fd20076c4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Bahar Etehadi
- Osman M. Karatepe
- R. Taormina
- A. Grobelna
- Olusegun A. Olugbade
- Xinyuan Zhao
- Anastasia Ozturk
- Junghoon Lee
In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Citations in the corpus
- Interrelating leadership behaviors, organizational socialization, and organizational culture (2008, methodology): “In a more recent review, Bauer et al. (1998) dedicated an entire section to socialization and culture, but did not refer to bureaucratic, innovative, or supportive organizational cultures.”
- Organizational socialization: the missing link between employee needs and organizational culture (2009, methodology): “Autry and Daugherty (2003) used the perspectives of Schein (1991) and Taormina (1997) to measure person-organization fit by using employee ratings of company pay systems (future prospects), and coworker cooperation (coworker support).”
- A model of supply chain and supply chain decision‐making complexity (2011, background): “The literature also suggests that a flexible workforce is a significant source of competitive advantage (Autry and Daugherty, 2003; Kathuria and Partovi, 1999). Similarly, Christopher (2000) finds that a well-developed human resource strategy that leads to multi-skill development and encourages cros”
- The impact of job insecurity on critical hotel employee outcomes: The mediating role of self-efficacy (2018, methodology): “from the work of Autry and Daugherty (2003). Participants were asked to report their responses via a seven-point scale of 7 (always) to 1 (never). SRP was operationalized through five items from Boshoff and Allen (2000). Respondents used a five-point scale of 5 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagr”