Measuring Team Knowledge
By Nancy J. Cooke, Eduardo Salas, J. Cannon-Bowers, Renée J. Stout. Hum. Factors, 2000
659 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e4ab8bbd1dfd8a4d39a9d86600077571adfe8ea
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- D. van Knippenberg
- M. Schippers
- Kyle Lewis
- Susan Mohammed
- Katherine Hamilton
- Lori A. Ferzandi
- Nancy J. Cooke
- Eduardo Salas
In Strategy and Management
- M. Schippers
- D. van Knippenberg
- Susan Mohammed
- Eduardo Salas
- Nancy J. Cooke
- Petra Badke-Schaub
- Cristina B. Gibson
- Deborah Blackman
Citations in the corpus
- Metaphor No More: A 15-Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct (2010, methodology): “Therefore, TMM similarity and accuracy are expected to change over time, although changes probably occur more quickly at the individual level (Cooke et al., 2000).”
- The Effects of Team-Skills Training on Transactive Memory and Performance (2007, neutral): “For example, Dyer’s (1987) general problemsolving model incorporates many of the elements of the goal-setting model.”
- Reflections on shared cognition (2001, background): “The final category, distributed, refers to a different definition of the term shared (see Mohammed and Dumville, 2001; Cooke et al., 2000).”
- Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for C4i environments. (2006, background): “Cooke (2004) suggests that teams are required to detect and interpret cues, remember, reason, plan, solve problems, acquire knowledge and make decisions as an integrated and co-ordinated unit.”
- On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments (2008, background): “These efforts have resulted in techniques to measure team knowledge in terms of an aggregate of individual knowledge or the “collection of task- and team-related knowledge held by teammates and their collective understanding of the current situation” (Cooke et al., 2000, p. 154).”