A factor analysis of Page and Wong’s servant leadership instrument

By R. Dennis, Bruce E. Winston. 2003

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e093151e68d9243e422eb18286a9d758dee0d52

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

Testing a Multidimensional Theory of Person-Environment Fit (2010, background): “…are primarily based in the United States, in a broad range of organizations and are thought to be a representative sample of company employees (Buchanan and Smith, 1999; Davis, 2007; Dennis and Winston, 2003; Judge et al., 2006; Maurer et al. 2007; Piccolo et al., 2008; Piccolo and Colquitt, 2006).”
Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis (2011, unknown): “An attempt by Dennis and Winston (2003) to replicate the factor structure, however, failed and revealed a three-dimensional structure among 1240 T ab le 1 T h e M ea su re m en t of S er va n t L ea d er sh ip L au b (1 99 9) W on g & D av ey ( 20 07 ) B ar bu to & W he el er (2 00 6) D en ni s &…”
The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure (2010, methodology): “When used in other samples than the development one, constructs that were hypothesized to be separate constructs collapsed into one (e.g., Dannhauser and Boshoff 2007; Dennis and Winston 2003).”
Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research (2019, methodology): “DeVellis, 2017; Hinkin, 1995, 1998). More specifically, we employ the scale development guidelines established by Hinkin (1995) given their systematic and comprehensive inclusion of psychometric properties of a measure.”
Development of the servant leadership assessment instrument (2005, background): “…leadership on assisting leaders to measure their effectiveness as servant leaders has resulted in focus on the roots of that effectiveness in the values of a servant leader (Dennis and Winston, 2003; Laub, 1999; Page and Wong, 2000; Patterson, 2003; Russell, 2000; Russell and Stone, 2002).”
Individual differences in servant leadership: the roles of values and personality (2006, methodology): “Employees perceptions of servant leadership were measured using Dennis and Winston's (2003)”