Testing a Multidimensional Theory of Person-Environment Fit

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Moderated Mediation between Work Life Balance and Employee Job Performance: The Role of Psychological Wellbeing and Satisfaction with Coworkers (2018, background): “Work-life balance reflects person-environment (PE) fit with respect to work and family domains (Edwards & Billsberry, 2010).”
Does West “Fit” with East? In Search of a Chinese Model of Person–Environment Fit (2015, methodology): “As the field has accumulated a mass of understandings of PE fit that are theory driven (Edwards & Billsberry, 2010), our qualitative design offers a novel opportunity to approach working adults’ fit experiences embedded in cultural contexts.”
Development of a Multidimensional Instrument of Person–Environment Fit: The Perceived Person–Environment Fit Scale (PPEFS) (2016, background): “Edwards and Billsberry (2010) tested Jansen and Kristof-Brown’s (2006) aggregate model against a competing model, in which multiple dimensions of fit were proposed to be distinct, assuming no overarching sense of fit.”
A test of the relationship between person–environment fit and cross-cultural adjustment among self-initiated expatriates (2014, background): “…of the work environment (e.g. job role, job demands and organizational demands) (Kristof-Brown, Zimmerman and Johnson 2005; Selmer 2005; D’Amato and Zijlstra 2008; Peltokorpi 2008; Peltokorpi and Froese 2009; Edwards and Billsberry 2010; Howe-Walsh and Schyns 2010; Festing and Maletzky 2011).”