Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research
By Yehuda Baruch, Brooks Holtom. 2008
3,611 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e006804e258aaa5d1295fbe48624030e835c316
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Staale Einarsen
- Hans De Witte
- M. B. Nielsen
- G. Notelaers
- A. Skogstad
- Ulla Kinnunen *
- Lars Glasø
- Arnold B. Bakker
Citations in the corpus
- Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators (2011, background): “7%) typical of studies conducted in organizations (see Baruch & Holtom, 2008 , for a meta-analysis).”
- The effect of team affective tone on team performance: the roles of team identification and team cooperation (2017, background): “2 Of the 775 questionnaires distributed to the members and leaders of 155 teams, 680 3 usable questionnaires from 141 teams were returned, a response rate of 87.7%, much higher 4 than average (Baruch & Holtom, 2008).”
- Career attitudes and success of managers: the impact of chance event, protean, and traditional careers (2012, background): “Of the 1048, 545 questionnaires were returned, accounting for a response rate of 52%, a figure above the norm of survey response rate in organizational research (Baruch and Holtom 2008).”
- Job demands-resources and early retirement intention: Differences between blue-and white-collar workers (2011, neutral): “This response rate was satisfactory (Baruch and Holtom, 2008).”
- Haunted by the Past: Effects of Poor Change Management History on Employee Attitudes and Turnover (2007, result): “This response rate is similar to the median response rate of 46% in recent organizational research (Baruch & Holtom, 2008).”
- Do they stay or do they go (2011, background): “The response rate is relatively high in both waves, 57 per cent in the first and 70 per cent in the second wave, respectively, which is considered a satisfactory response rate in this kind of study ( Baruch and Holtom, 2008”
- Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: A meta-analytic review (2012, neutral): “%) for organizational surveys (Baruch & Holtom, 2008).”
- Burnout and engagement: Identical twins or just close relatives? (2017, neutral): “In total 1535 employees completed the questionnaire fully (41.0% response rate), which was considered acceptable (compare Baruch & Holtom, 2008).”
- The Mediating Role of Appraisal Feedback Reactions on the Relationship Between Rater Feedback-Related Behaviors and Ratee Performance (2010, background): “High response rates are quite common for company-sponsored, e-mail surveys (Baruch & Holtom, 2008).”
- Assessing the Effects of Cultural Intelligence on Team Knowledge Sharing From a Socio‐Cognitive Perspective (2013, methodology): “Moreover, Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm an independent t-test in this research for detecting nonresponse bias recommended by Baruch and Holtom (2008) did not show any significant difference between early and late respondents.”