The relative impact of attribute, severity, and timing of psychological contract breach on behavioral and attitudinal outcomes

By Stephanie Eckerd, James A. Hill, Kenneth K. Boyer, Karen Donohue, Peter T. Ward. 2013

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4380bd5619054a5a5b33a9bd2b9d9eaccbedc087

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. Stephanie Eckerd
2. J. Hartmann
3. Sabine Moeller
4. Lutz Kaufmann
5. Craig R. Carter
6. Mohammad Asif Salam
7. Helen Walker
8. Stephen Brammer

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Lutz Kaufmann
2. J. Hartmann
3. Sabine Moeller
4. Craig R. Carter
5. Stephanie Eckerd
6. Elliot Bendoly

In Strategy and Management

1. Lutz Kaufmann
2. Craig R. Carter
3. J. Hartmann
4. Sabine Moeller
5. Elliot Bendoly
6. Robert D. Klassen
7. Helen Walker
8. Felix Reimann

Citations in the corpus

• On making experimental design choices: Discussions on the use and challenges of demand effects, incentives, deception, samples, and vignettes (2020, methodology): “…have been conducted in OM (Lonati et al., 2018), those that do tend also to make use of confederates in order to control the treatments participants are exposed to or to provide important contextual knowledge (e.g., Eckerd et al., 2013; Sommer et al., 2020 and described in Section 3 below).”
• Chain liability in multitier supply chains? Responsibility attributions for unsustainable supplier behavior (2014, background): “Eckerd et al. (2013) use AT to understand how breaches of psychological contracts affect work behaviors and attitudinal perceptions, in the context of two supply chain partners.”