Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams

By Daniel Robey Huoy, Min Khoo, Carolyn Powers, K. Smith, S. Pawlowski, Marie-Claude Boudreau, P. Singleton, Pamela Wright We, Wanda J. Orlikowski, Stephen R. Barley and 2 more. 2000

381 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0af2ba0033b68822d1f6a1939133f5c4fbfe0052

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Framing the Effects of Multinational Cultural Diversity on Virtual Team Processes (2016, background): “The negative effects of cultural differences may be alleviated by an effort to actively understand the differences (Robey et al., 2000).”
Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams (2003, background): “Like face-to-face (or synchronous) computer-mediated groups, the effectiveness of asynchronously communicating teams reflects the degrees to which outputs meet quality standards and work processes enhance the capability of the team to perform to these standards [24, 53].”
The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance Over Time (2007, background): “It has thus been observed that it is beneficial for virtual teams to have socio-emotional communications (Maznevski and Chudoba 2000; Robey et al. 2000).”
Understanding Sustained Participation in Open Source Software Projects (2009, background): “…participant who is an essential player. research Hypotheses—Sustained Participation in OSS communities l ave anD w enger ’ s [31] theorY originateD From observations of informal professional communities of practice, and has been extended to divergent organizational contexts (e.g., [8, 40, 41, 50]).”
Virtual teams: team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness (2004, background): “…adapt to contextual and environmental changes such as cultural diversity, differences in work practices, and variations in time zones and schedules (Robey et al., 2000); most importantly, they must learn to effectively use information and communication technologies as the backbone of their…”
Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research (2004, background): “Efforts to minimize cultural barriers have also been shown to improve coordination of team members (Robey et al., 2000).”
Nature of virtual teams: a summary of their advantages and disadvantages (2008, background): “The rapid uptake of the Internet and related communication technologies has afforded organizations unbounded opportunities to adopt virtual teams that transcend time, space, national culture and organizations (Robey et al., 2000).”
Behavioral adaptation within cross-cultural virtual teams (2006, background): “This may require team members to change the way they behave and interact [21].”
The contexts of knowing: natural history of a globally distributed team (2004, neutral): “25, 547–587 (2004) in a single nation ( Robey, Khoo, & Powers, 1999; DeSanctis et al., 2000).”
Growing primacy of human agency in adaptation and change in the electronic era (2002, background): “They also serve as a convenient vehicle for building virtual social networks for creating shared knowledge through collaborative learning and problem solving ( Robey, Khoo, & Powers, 2000 ).”