Effective Discussion Through a Computer-Mediated Anchored Forum

By Mark J. Guzdial, Jennifer Turns. 2000

414 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a27ffd071a673911e51add98631657f4631f020

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses (2009, methodology): “Overall, the amounts of note writing and reading were consistent with those in other studies of online discourse (Guzdial and Turns 2000; Hsi and Hoadley 1997).”
Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning (2003, methodology): “…in learning results, both on individual and collective levels, the empirical research has also revealed disadvantages of CSCL. Guzdial (1997) and Guzdial and Turns (2000) studied 35 university-level electronic conferences, and discovered that on an average, students wrote only 4.8 notes…”
Integrating collaborative PBL with blended learning to explore preservice teachers’ development of online learning communities (2010, background): “Many researchers (Guzdial & Turns, 2000; Ligoria, 2001; Lin, Lin, & Huang, 2008) have indicated that cooperation is crucial to the performance of an online learning community.”
Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning (2002, background): “…challenges of CSCL: knowledge management problems with large databases, fact-oriented knowledge construction, short discussion threads with divergence topics, and unequal participation patterns (Guzdial & Turns, 2000; Lipponen et. al., 2001; Lipponen, Rahikainen, Lallimo, & Hakkarainen, 2001).”
Seven Affordances of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: How to Support Collaborative Learning? How Can Technologies Help? (2016, neutral): “Students have different preferences for collaborative work, and some may be reluctant to participate (Barron, 2003; Guzdial & Turns, 2000; Sinha, Rogat, Adams-Wig-gins, & Hmelo-Silver, 2015).”
Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis (2006, methodology): “Guzdial and Turns (2000) developed a collaboration script approach for discussion forums, in which a principally infinite number of learners can participate.”
Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning (2004, background): “…(Suthers, 1999), thinking types (CSILE; Knowledge Forum) (Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1991), anchoring through writing or discussion prompts (CaMILE) (Guzdial & Turns, 2000), or perspectives to represent information in a communal database (e.g. individual, team, class or comparison) (Webguide)…”
Combining Individual and Group-Level Perspectives for Studying Collaborative Knowledge Construction in Context. (2007, neutral): “Collaboration in computer-mediated discussion has been typically evaluated by analysing and assessing the cognitive quality of discourse on individual messages (e.g., Gudzial & Turns, 2000).”
Toward an Understanding of How Threads Die in Asynchronous Computer Conferences (2005, background): “To make disciplined progress on a line of inquiry, learners must be aware of the issues and problems that the group is pursuing and tailor their actions accordingly (Guzdial & Turns, 2000).”