EFFECTS OF ROTATED LEADERSHIP AND PEER EVALUATION ON THE FUNCTIONING AND EFFECTIVENESS OF SELF‐MANAGED TEAMS: A QUASI‐EXPERIMENT
By A. Erez, Jeffrey LePine, Heather Elms. 2002
269 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a1c59982a2ae2bbd2c7ee76ef7ab116d6928bfb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- P. Levy
- D. Baker
- Vincent Rousseau
- Caroline Aubé
- John E. Mathieu
- Michael R. Kukenberger
- Federico Aime
- Jeffrey LePine
In Social Psychology
- Federico Aime
- Caroline Aubé
- Vincent Rousseau
- D. S. Derue
- John E. Mathieu
- T. Judge
- Stephen H. Courtright
- Daniel R. Ilgen
In Sociology and Political Science
- Vincent Rousseau
- Caroline Aubé
- P. Levy
- E. W. Morrison
- D. Baker
- Federico Aime
- Daniel R. Ilgen
- T. Judge
Citations in the corpus
- Peer Assessment in Small Groups: A Comparison of Methods (2008, methodology): “…that collecting and sharing peer feedback with students increases self-awareness, workload sharing, likelihood of speaking in the group, cooperation among members, and as a result, higher group performance (Brooks & Ammons, 2003; Druskat & Wolff, 1999; Erez et al., 2002; Greguras et al., 2001).”
- Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research (2011, background): “Voice is more common as well in groups that are self-managing rather than traditional (LePine & Van Dyne, 1998 ), and in groups that adopt egalitarian practices such as rotated leadership and peer evaluations (Erez, LePine, & Elms, 2002 ).”
- The Bright and Dark Sides of Personality: Implications for Personnel Selection in Individual and Team Contexts (2007, background): “Because team member voice may be strongly related to team effectiveness in contexts where there is any degree of decision latitude or the need for innovation or adaptability (Erez et al., 2002), staffing a team with highly agreeable members in these types of contexts may be detrimental.”
- The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future (2004, background): “The landscape of performance appraisal changed dramatically from a purely measurement focus to one in which the cognitive processes of appraisal became paramount as a result ofLandy and Farr’s (1980) classic paper (see also Feldman, 1981 ). A second major change to this research area slowly evolved ”
- The riddle of heterarchy: : power transitions in cross-functional teams (2014, background): “Promoting rotated leadership structures (Erez et al., 2002) might also be an effective strategy for developing 36!”
- Benefits and Problems With Student Teams: Suggestions for Improving Team Projects (2006, background): “Students react more positively and attain higher levels of performance not only when peer evaluations are used (Erez et al., 2002), but also when evaluations contribute to the course grade (Feichtner & Davis, 1984).”
- Voice Climate, Supervisor Undermining, and Work Outcomes (2015, background): “In regard to group voice behavior, while there is growing interest in citizenship behaviors at the group level (e.g., Bommer, Miles, & Grover, 2003; Ehrhart & Naumann, 2004; Schnake & Dumler, 2003), only one empirical study to date has examined group voice behavior (i.e., Erez et al., 2002).”
- Self-Leadership: A Multilevel Review (2011, background): “A more specific area that relates to the influence of leadership on self-leadership is the notion of empowering leadership, which involves passing on influence to followers as part of the leadership process (Ford & Fottler, 1995).”