Benefits and Problems With Student Teams: Suggestions for Improving Team Projects

By Randall S. Hansen. 2006

365 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Information Systems and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b46c46376503d99c026d6ae944b83838b7334ba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. David Hall
2. Matthew W. Ohland
3. Misty L. Loughry
4. S. Buzwell
5. D. Woehr
6. Robin Bell

In Information Systems and Management

1. David Hall
2. Cynthia J. Finelli
3. S. Buzwell
4. D. Woehr
5. Robin Bell

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. David Hall
2. Matthew W. Ohland
3. Misty L. Loughry
4. S. Buzwell
5. Richard M. Felder
6. D. Woehr
7. Robin Bell
8. M. Schippers

Citations in the corpus

• The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation (2012, background): “Using self- and peer evaluations is one way instructors can attempt to manage teamwork in their classes to create better teamwork experiences for their students (Gueldenzoph & May, 2002; Hansen, 2006).”
• Developing the next generation of entrepreneurs: Giving students the opportunity to gain experience and thrive (2015, background): “Hansen (2006) argues that instructor organised groups are more effective than randomized group formations.”
• The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution (2013, background): “Email: djhall@swin.edu.au work in the workplace, which is an increasingly important skill required by employers (Aggarwal and O’Brien, 2008; Hansen, 2006).”