Firm factors, industry structure and performance variation: New empirical evidence to a classic debate
By Jeremy Galbreath, Peter Baer Galvin. 2008
273 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/086dba0c07452852361e615a50f7f5c36427f057
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Stephan M. Liozu
- Corinna Dögl
- Rıfat Kamaşak
- Andreas Hinterhuber
- Dirk Holtbrügge
- Paul K. Shum
- Jeremy Galbreath
- Aron O'Cass
Citations in the corpus
- Pricing orientation, pricing capabilities, and firm performance (2013, methodology): “Finally, subjective performance measures are widely used in research on strategy (Anderson and Paine, 1975; Galbreath and Galvin, 2008; Gruber et al., 2010; Lau, 2011; Ortega, 2010; Spanos and Lioukas, 2001) and marketing (Kohli and Jaworski, 1990; Narver and Slater, 1990; Olavarrieta and Friedmann,”
- Do customer satisfaction and reputation mediate the CSR–FP link? Evidence from Australia (2012, background): “a typical response rate of 5–10 percent, suggesting our response rate was adequate in a country suffering from severe survey fatigue (Galbreath and Galvin, 2008).”
- The contribution of tangible and intangible resources, and capabilities to a firm’s profitability and market performance (2013, methodology): “This interaction between resources and industry structure variables should be considered in RBV studies to account simultaneously for the effects of every factor in explaining performance differences (Huselid, 1995; Morgan et al., 2009).”
- The impact of industry force factors on resource competitive strategies and hotel performance (2011, unknown): “First of all, following the lead of Galbreath and Galvin (2008), this study integrates two approaches: industry five forces approach and resource-based theory.”
- Corporate environmental responsibility, employer reputation and employee commitment: an empirical study in developed and emerging economies (2014, background): “Moreover, it corresponds with the typical response rate of direct mail surveys of 5–10% (Galbreath and Galvin 2008).”