Longitudinal Invariance of Self-Esteem and Method Effects Associated With Negatively Worded Items
By Robert W. Motl, C. Distefano. 2002
161 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0784d90f7f5e0168a0f4a355f64f82e6725443a2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- A. Alexandrov
- Robert W. Motl
- C. Distefano
- J. Oakman
- Evan F. Risko
- Lena C. Quilty
- Bert Weijters
- N. Nguyen
In Management Science and Operations Research
- C. Distefano
- A. Alexandrov
- Robert W. Motl
- Lena C. Quilty
- J. Oakman
- Evan F. Risko
- Bert Weijters
- Niels Schillewaert
In Sociology and Political Science
- A. Alexandrov
- Robert W. Motl
- C. Distefano
- J. Oakman
- Evan F. Risko
- Lena C. Quilty
- N. Nguyen
- Christopher J. L. Cunningham
Citations in the corpus
- Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test (2006, background): “However, recent studies suggest that negatively worded items can change a construct’s meaning (Motl and DiStefano 2002).”
- Correlates of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Method Effects (2006, methodology): “Critics of this method chiefly disparage its assumption of the unidimensionality of method effects and its tendency to result in ill-defined solutions (Bagozzi, 1993; Marsh, 1989; Motl & DiStefano, 2002; Tomás & Oliver, 1999).”
- Facets of visual aesthetics (2010, background): “Finally, single-item measures are subject to acquiescence bias that cannot be controlled by mixing positively and negatively keyed items (Motl and DiStefano, 2002).”
- Modelling method effects as individual causal effects (2007, background): “…between the factor of the positively and the factor of the negatively formulated items (Russell and Carroll, 1999; Barrett and Russell, 1998), whereas others used confirmatory factor analysis multitrait–multimethod models (Horan et al., 2003; Motl and DiStefano, 2002) to analyse this phenomenon.”
- The Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale (2006, background): “Previous research indicates that the use of items with reverse polarity within the same scale can attenuate relationships between the variables under study (Motl, Conroy, & Horan, 2000; Motl & DiStefano, 2002).”
- Acquiescence in personality questionnaires: Relevance, domain specificity, and stability☆ (2015, background): “…other authors have considered the response bias associated with wording effects as wording method factors and also find relatively high stability of these factors, for instance, in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Gana et al., 2013; Marsh, Scalas, & Nagengast, 2010; Motl & DiStefano, 2002).”
- Further Investigating Method Effects Associated With Negatively Worded Items on Self-Report Surveys (2006, methodology): “Motl and DiStefano (2002) further reported that method effects associated with negatively worded items demonstrated longitudinal invariance, and therefore, may represent a behavioral consistency operating across time (Billiet & McClendon, 2000).”
- The proximity effect: The role of inter-item distance on reverse-item bias (2009, background): “…problems ; in particular, reversed items tend to show lower factor loadings and lead to lower internal consistency because of their weaker correlation with the nonreversed items that measure the same construct (Herche & Engelland, 1996; Motl & DiStefano, 2002; Quilty, Oakman, & Risko, 2006).”
- Fear of Death and Supernatural Beliefs: Developing A New Supernatural Belief Scale to Test the Relationship (2013, unknown): “…questionnaires, observer ratings), content categories, similarly worded test items, or reverse scoring (cf. Barnette, 2000; Brown, 2006; Crawford & Henry, 2004; Knight, Chisholm,Marsh, &Godfrey, 1988;Marsh, 1996;Motl & DiStefano, 2002; Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003; Woods, 2006).”
- The ubiquity of common method variance: The case of the Big Five (2011, methodology): “These studies included analyses of data collected with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale (Marsh, 1996; Marsh et al., 2010; Motl & DeStefano, 2002; Tomás & Oliver, 1999) and investigations of the possibility that common method bias may represent or reflect respondent faking or socially desirable…”
- Characteristics of Single-Item Measures in Likert Scale Format (2010, background): “Factors based on negatively-worded items have strong method effects and exhibit longitudinal invariance (Motl and DiStefano 2002; Horan et al. 2003).”
- Autonomy support and achievement goals as predictors of perceived school performance and life satisfaction in the transition between lower and upper secondary school (2014, background): “that negatively worded items may interfere with examinations of the latent structure of a construct (Motl and DiStefano 2002).”