Acquiescence in personality questionnaires: Relevance, domain specificity, and stability☆

By D. Danner, Julian Aichholzer, Beatrice Rammstedt. 2015

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f56a3c0ed6c91748db9c654817baf2f91cc651d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Oliver P. John
2. C. Soto
3. Kibeom Lee
4. M. Ashton

In Clinical Psychology

1. C. Soto
2. Oliver P. John
3. James J. Gross
4. Mei-Lin Chang
5. Beatrice Rammstedt
6. Jutta Joormann
7. E. Gullone
8. Michela Schröder‐Abé

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Oliver P. John
2. C. Soto
3. J. McDonald
4. Jörg Matthes
5. A. Agbo

Citations in the corpus

• The Next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and Assessing a Hierarchical Model With 15 Facets to Enhance Bandwidth, Fidelity, and Predictive Power (2017, background): “…d i ss e m i n a t e d b r o a d l y . original BFI—especially Open-Mindedness and several of the post hoc facet scales—have a substantial imbalance of true-keyed and false-keyed items, allowing acquiescence to distort their associations with other variables (Danner, Aichholzer, & Rammstedt, 2015).”