Correlates of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Method Effects

By Lena C. Quilty, J. Oakman, Evan F. Risko. 2006

170 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e08224492d68121eb299383351a1e1d5db57b273

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Scott W. Plunkett
2. A. Supple
3. Niels Schillewaert
4. Bert Weijters
5. G. Peterson
6. Maggie Geuens
7. K. Bush
8. J. Su

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Bert Weijters
2. Niels Schillewaert
3. Maggie Geuens
4. T. Thomas
5. Yves Van Vaerenbergh
6. Elke Cabooter
7. R. Jensen
8. Morten Jakobsen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Bert Weijters
2. Niels Schillewaert
3. A. Supple
4. Scott W. Plunkett
5. G. Peterson
6. Maggie Geuens
7. K. Bush
8. J. Su

Citations in the corpus

• Factor Structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (2013, background): “The advantage of these models over the correlated uniquenesses models includes the ability (in subsequent analyses) to link method effects to possible covariates as a means to understand how these effects might vary across respondents (Marsh et al., 2010; Quilty et al., 2006).”
• The proximity effect: The role of inter-item distance on reverse-item bias (2009, background): “Unfortunately, the use of reversed items has its own methodological problems; inparticular, reversed items tend to show lower factor loadings and lead to lower internal consistency because of their weaker correlation with the nonreversed items that measure the same construct (Herche & Engelland,1996”