Characteristics of Single-Item Measures in Likert Scale Format
By A. Alexandrov. 2010
93 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a54a674119459450ba6746adcb919221f2855233
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yvette Graham
- Ondrej Bojar
- Alistair Moffat
- Timothy Baldwin
- Justin Zobel
- James Mccloskey
- Jean–Marc Dewaele
- Qingsong Ma
Citations in the corpus
- Attitudes towards foreign accents among adult multilingual language users (2015, background): “Single-item Likert measures are perfectly acceptable in research (Alexandrov 2010).”
- Equidistance of Likert-Type Scales and Validation of Inferential Methods Using Experiments and Simulations (2013, methodology): “In business and management, Likert-type scales are often used by researchers to collect data (Alexandrov, 2010).”
- Continuous Measurement Scales in Human Evaluation of Machine Translation (2013, background): “Alexandrov (2010) provides a summary of the extensive literature on the numerous issues associated with adjectival scale labels, including bias resulting from positively and negatively worded items not being true opposites of one another, and items intended to have neutral intensity in fact proving…”
- Is Machine Translation Getting Better over Time? (2014, background): “Alexandrov (2010) provides a sum-mary of the extensive problems associated with the use of adjectival scale labels, including bias resulting from positively-and negatively-worded items not being true opposites of one another, and items intended to have neutral intensity in fact proving to have…”