Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test
By Andrew Burton-Jones, Detmar W. Straub Jr.. Information systems research, 2006
1,178 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6b3b99b273a21ce1b157bfad88ecbd7ca92e1d5e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- V. Venkatesh
- Heshan Sun
- Jason Bennett Thatcher
- James Y. L. Thong
- Andrew Burton-Jones
- Tamara Dinev
- Likoebe Mohau Maruping
- Paul A. Pavlou
In Information Systems and Management
- V. Venkatesh
- Izak Benbasat
- Heshan Sun
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- James Y. L. Thong
- Paul A. Pavlou
- Nripendra P. Rana
- Tao Zhou
In Sociology and Political Science
- V. Venkatesh
- Izak Benbasat
- Heshan Sun
- James Y. L. Thong
- Paul A. Pavlou
- Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi
- Tao Zhou
- Tamara Dinev
Citations in the corpus
- Mobile Application Usability: Conceptualization and Instrument Development (2015, background): “However, being aware of the variety of conceptualizations of technology use in IS research (see Burton-Jones and Straub 2006; Sykes and Venkatesh 2015), we note that the generalizability of our findings is constrained by the limitations of the continued intention to use construct.”
- Understanding User Revisions When Using Information Systems Features: Adaptive System Use and Triggers (2012, background): “Discrepancies can be seen as the contradictions among elements (i.e., task, features, user) of the current system use activity (Burton-Jones and Straub 2006).”
- Information System Use - Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use (2007, methodology): “By including task-technology and individual adaptation behaviors as its dimensions, whether or not they involve physical interactions with an IT, the ISURA construct represents an initial step in the conceptualization and measurement of a usage construct that corresponds to the sixth category of ric”
- On the Use of Neuropyhsiological Tools in IS Research: Developing a Research Agenda for NeuroIS (2012, background): “These tools may be able to assess what Burton-Jones and Straub (2006) refer to as “deep structure” usage.”
- Information privacy and correlates: an empirical attempt to bridge and distinguish privacy-related concepts (2013, methodology): “…be extended: on one hand, consumers may assess the outcomes of information disclosure; on the other hand, they may also attend to evaluate the sensitivity of requested information, organization’s information-handling practices, and the regulatory environment that enable them to assess the risks…”
- Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model (2008, methodology): “The Conceptual Model 3 The subsequent section also aligns with step one (structure) of the Burton-Jones and Straub (2006) two-step approach to construct operationalization.”
- Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships (2008, methodology): “Organizing the literature review Because of the popularity of the D&M model in the academic literature, it seemed appropriate to organize the studies of IS success that were found using its taxonomy.”
- When Does Technology Use Enable Network Change in Organizations? A Comparative Study of Feature Use and Shared Affordances (2013, background): “These patterns of use suggest that members of both groups first adopted an explorative strategy when using the technology and, later, members of one group moved to an exploitative strategy (Burton-Jones and Straub 2006; Kane and Alavi 2007).”