Error correction, revision, and learning

By John Truscott, A. Hsu. 2008

493 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/050967ac977dc9a5e5fca674baeccbb49b57b2cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

The revision and transfer effects of direct and indirect comprehensive corrective feedback on ESL students’ writing (2018, methodology): “(Ferris & Roberts, 2001, p. 162) Unlike most previous studies (e.g., Truscott & Hsu, 2008; Van Beuningen et al., 2012, Shintani & Ellis, 2013; Shintani, Ellis, & Suzuki, 2014) that provided the CF in only one session, the current study involved multiple feedback sessions.”
Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing (2018, background): “Equally however, research reminds us that it does not always fulfill this potential (e.g. Ferris, 2006; Truscott & Hsu, 2008) and surveys reveal significant student dissatisfaction (Carless, 2006).”
The Potential Role(s) of Writing in Second Language Development. (2012, background): “Just a few studies have investigated the effects of the more pedagogically plausible unfocused corrective feedback (Ellis, Sheen, Murakami, & Takashima, 2008; Hartshorn et al., 2010; Truscott & Hsu, 2008; Van Beuningen, De Jong, & Kuiken, 2008, 2012).”
Research into practice: Written corrective feedback (2012, unknown): “Although there is research that demonstrates the efficacy of comprehensive and unfocused WCF, studies that indicate its benefits are as yet few and far between (Truscott & Hsu 2008; Van Beuningen, De Jong & Kuiken 2008).”
“I just want to do it right, but it's so hard”: A novice teacher's written feedback beliefs and practices (2015, background): “…correction in L2 writing classes; nevertheless, the ultimate success of error feedback on the improvement of L2 writing remains inconclusive (for a review of these issues see especially the ongoing debates between Ferris, 1999, 2004, and Truscott, 1996, 1999, 2004, 2007 and Truscott & Hsu, 2008).”
SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING RESEARCH AND WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN SLA (2010, background): “The most fervent recent opponent of written CF in L2 writing is Truscott ( 1996 , 1999 , 2004 , 2007 ; Truscott & Hsu, 2008), who has called for the abolishment of this practice.”
Student perceptions of hidden messages in teacher written feedback (2013, background): “Here studies have found strong student support for corrective grammar feedback (e.g. Schulz, 2001) but the benefits of this may be limited to improvements in a subsequent draft rather than to longer term learning (Truscott & Hsu, 2008).”
Critical Feedback on Written Corrective Feedback Research. (2010, background): “In studies where the feedback was unfocused (e.g. Storch 2009; Truscott & Hsu, 2008), different ratio scores (EFT/T, Errors/words) were used rather than frequencies (mean number of errors).”