Introduction: Second Language Development as a Dynamic Process

By K. de Bot. 2008

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cultural Studies, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02da6cc41c06b85660dfe1890c291bd55233f5ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Cultural Studies

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning: Change, Stability, and Context. (2014, methodology): “, de Bot, 2008a; Dörnyei, 2009b; Jessner, 2008; Larsen–Freeman, 2006; Larsen–Freeman & Cameron, 2008; Mercer, 2011a; Verspoor, Lowie, & VanDijk, 2008), or without explicitly adopting a The Modern Language Journal, 98, 3, (2014)”
Language Learner Motivational Types: A Cluster Analysis Study (2014, background): “…variables that continuously interact with the learning context, rather than the result of the impact of individual variables on behavior in a linear cause-and-effect fashion (de Bot, 2008; D¨ornyei, 2009a; Ellis & Larsen-Freeman, 2009; Larsen-Freeman, 1997; Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008).”
The Development of Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in Second Language Performance: A Longitudinal Study (2017, background): “In DST, on the other hand, cognitive resources are limited but connected and possibly compensatory (de Bot 2008).”
Researching complex dynamic systems: ‘Retrodictive qualitative modelling’ in the language classroom (2011, background): “…family examining complex, dynamic, nonlinear systems (for some accessible overviews in L2 research, see Ellis & LarsenFreeman 2006, 2009; de Bot et al. 2007; de Bot 2008; Larsen-Freeman & Cameron 2008a; van Geert 2008; Dörnyei 2009a, b; de Bot & Larsen-Freeman 2011; Verspoor, de Bot & Lowie 2011).”
THE ROLE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRAGMATIC COMPREHENSION (2008, background): “…SLA—as represented in theories of dynamic systems, chaos0complexity, and emergentism—that view L2 development as a contextualized and dynamic process ~de Bot, 2008; Ellis & Larsen-Freeman, 2006; Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008!+ Because context is a complex system, close examination of its…”
What is special about L3 processing?* (2013, background): “The core of a DST approach is that multilingualism is not a state but a process (de Bot, 2008, 2012b; Herdina & Jessner, 2002; Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008; Verspoor, Lowie & de Bot, 2012).”
Exploring the Fluctuations of Foreign Language Enjoyment in Conversation: An Idiodynamic Perspective (2018, background): “Generally, dynamic systems are constantly changing and self-organizing (de Bot, 2008).”
A Longitudinal Analysis of the Effects of One Year Abroad (2012, methodology): “Although the current study was not designed within the Dynamic Systems Theory (DST), the results that are reported here can be explained using some of the major tenets of this theory (de Bot, 2008; Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008; Verspoor, de Bot, & Lowie, 2011).”
The Heart of Heritage: Sociocultural Dimensions of Heritage Language Learning (2010, background): “In applied linguistics, this view is most saliently expressed in the concern with the dynamic nature of language learning (de Bot, 2008; Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008; Markee, 2008); the ecology of language learning (Kramsch, 2002; van Lier, 2004); the sociocultural foundation of language learning…”
Individual Differences: Interplay of Learner Characteristics and Learning Environment (2009, background): “…interferences between the components’ own trajectories result in nonlinear, emergent changes in the overall system behavior (for overviews, see, e.g., de Bot, 2008; de Bot, Lowie, & Verspoor, 2007; Dörnyei, 2009; Ellis & Larsen-Freeman, 2006; Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008a; van Geert, 2008).”