Is personality associated with perceptions of LMX? An empirical study

By Jeremy B. Bernerth, A. Armenakis, H. S. Feild, W. Giles, H. J. Walker. 2007

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0135228d2f96674abbf35225861ced7996a989d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. O. Epitropaki
2. Robin Martin
3. Robyn L. Brouer
4. R. Liden
5. William H. Bommer
6. D. Day
7. Gerald R. Ferris
8. B. Schyns

In Gender Studies

1. B. Schyns
2. O. Epitropaki
3. Robin Martin
4. G. Thomas
5. Gerald R. Ferris
6. Robyn L. Brouer
7. Yves R. F. Guillaume
8. R. Liden

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. O. Epitropaki
2. B. Schyns
3. Robin Martin
4. Gerald R. Ferris
5. Allan Lee
6. G. Thomas
7. R. Liden
8. Yves R. F. Guillaume

Citations in the corpus

• Critique and review of leader–member exchange theory: Issues of agreement, consensus, and excellence (2010, background): “LMX has been researched mainly in individualist cultures, such as the United States and Europe (eg, Bernerth, Armenakis, Feild, Giles, & Walker, 2007 ; van Breukelen et al, 2002 ) but it has also been examined in collectivist cultures such as China and Japan (Graen & Wakabayashi, 1994 ).”
• Leader-member Exchange (LMX) and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review (2016, background): “The LMX-7 and LMXMDM dominate the LMX literature despite some authors suggesting that neither sufficiently captures the quality of the exchanges between leader and follower (see Bernerth et al., 2007).”
• A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Consequences of Leader-Member Exchange (2012, background): “Because of this, it has been argued that individuals high in NA have difficulty building effective work relationships (Bernerth et al., 2007; Hui, Law, & Chen, 1999).”