The Impact of Cognitive Styles on Authoritarianism Based Conservatism and Racism
By I. Cornelis, Alain Van Hiel. 2006
98 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c836e08016c3a6ca49314aa90d37ab3e5284f70
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The closed mind: ‘Experience’ and ‘cognition’ aspects of openness to experience and need for closure as psychological bases for right–wing attitudes (2011, methodology): “…models that explain racism often take the form of mediation models in which social attitudes (like RWA) ‘transmit’ the effects of openness (e.g. Ekehammar et al., 2004; Van Hiel et al., 2007) and NFC (e.g. Cornelis & Van Hiel, 2006; Crowson et al., 2005; Van Hiel et al., 2004) on prejudice.”
- Authoritarianism, Threat, and Prejudice: An Analysis of Mediation and Moderation (2009, background): “Relatedly, authoritarians may be more gullible than nonauthoritarians in general due to differences in cognitive style (eg, a higher need for predictability; Cornelis & Van Hiel, 2006 ; see also Altemeyer, 1996 , for an analysis of cognitive correlates of RWA).”
- Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology (2017, background): “…cognition were associated with economic (as well as social) conservatism and with ideological self-placement and issue-based conservatism as well as right-wing authoritarianism (e.g., Cornelis & Van Hiel, 2006; Crowson, 2009; Everett, 2013; Hennes, Nam, Stern, & Jost, 2012; Sterling et al., 2016).”