Direct contact and authoritarianism as moderators between extended contact and reduced prejudice

By Kristof Dhont, Alain Van Hiel. 2011

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/572f5c1fd0689b6427e34c34b439b79cf9aa5514

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. K. Moffat
2. Airong Zhang

In Social Psychology

1. K. Moffat
2. Airong Zhang

In Sociology and Political Science

1. K. Moffat
2. Airong Zhang

Citations in the corpus

• The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining $ (2014, result): “The mediating role of trust between positive contact and cooperation with various outgroups has also been observed in numerous other studies (Dhont and Hiel, 2011; Maoz and McCauley, 2011; Pagotto et al., 2013; Turner et al., 2013; Vezzali et al., 2012).”
• Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact (2014, unknown): “CONCLUSIONS: DIRECT VERSUS INDIRECT CONTACT As noted by Wright and colleagues (1997; see also Dovidio et al., 2011; Harwood, 2010; Turner, Hewstone, Voci, et al., 2007), indirect contact has some advantages over direct contact. First, it evokes less intergroup anxiety. Second, membership salience is”