Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation: Relationships With Various Forms of Racism

By Alain Van Hiel, Ivan Mervielde. 2005

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/45dbe2a6bc51ba28602a06e465dc96b50b3e8d41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The closed mind: ‘Experience’ and ‘cognition’ aspects of openness to experience and need for closure as psychological bases for right–wing attitudes (2011, methodology): “In Sample 2, a 10-itemGeneral Conservatism scale (Van Hiel & Mervielde, 1996) was assessed, measuring attitudes towards topics such as ‘legalization of euthanasia’ and ‘more police control to reduce criminality’.”
Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice: The Social Dominance Human–Animal Relations Model (SD–HARM) (2016, background): “%) than each of them alone (Altemeyer, 1998; Hodson et al., 2017; Van Hiel & Mervielde, 2005).”
The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity (2015, background): “Importantly, RWA and SDO are complementary, unique predictors of prejudice, both accounting for different aspects, such as prejudice towards different types of outgroups, and together explaining 50% of variance in prejudice (Altemeyer, 1998; Son Hing & Zanna, 2010; Van Hiel & Mervielde, 2005).”
Social Dominance Orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Sexism, and Prejudice Toward Women in the Workforce (2008, methodology): “Basic research on prejudice has differentiated among forms of prejudice (e.g., Glick & Fiske, 1996, 1997; see Van Hiel & Mervielde, 2005 for a comprehensive discussion).”
Changing the ideological roots of prejudice: Longitudinal effects of ethnic intergroup contact on social dominance orientation (2014, background): “…unique predictor of a multitude of intergroup phenomena and types of prejudice across different domains, for example, racial and ethnic prejudice (Hodson & Esses, 2005; Pratto et al., 1994; van Hiel & Mervielde, 2005) and sexism (Roets, van Hiel, & Dhont, 2012; Sibley, Wilson, & Duckitt, 2007a).”
Right–Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Differentially Moderate Intergroup Effects on Prejudice (2010, unknown): “Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002).”
Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice (2007, unknown): “Research with the RWA scale supported the earlier findings by showing that it consistently predicted prejudiced attitudes to different outgroups, minorities, and other stigmatised social groups, and was a strong correlate of generalized prejudice (Altemeyer, 1998, 1996; Van Hiel & Mervielde, 2005 )”
Host society's dislike of the Islamic veil: The role of subtle prejudice, values, and religion. (2009, background): “The scale (10 items) contains three subscales: (a) perception of minorities as lacking and thus threatening the host society’s established values, especially work and success values (4 items); (b) a strong emphasis on between-group cultural differences, a process that sets the outgroup aside as a ‘‘”
Is Sexism a Gender Issue? A Motivated Social Cognition Perspective on Men's and Women's Sexist Attitudes toward Own and Other Gender (2012, background): “Indeed, Allport also described the prejudice-prone individual in terms of needs and demands for clear-cut structure, for (social) order, for firm answers and definiteness and intolerance of ambiguity (see, Dhont, Roets & Van Hiel, 2011; Roets & Van Hiel, 2011a).”
Direct contact and authoritarianism as moderators between extended contact and reduced prejudice (2011, background): “Anti-immigrant prejudice Respondents completed three items measuring prejudice toward immigrants (Billiet & De Witte, 1991; Van Hiel & Mervielde, 2005).”
Cognitive ability, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation: A five-year longitudinal study amongst adolescents (2011, unknown): “Previous research that has investigated the cognitive processing characteristics of RWA and SDO individuals, has likened those high on RWA to “cognitive misers” who have high levels of need for closure and who expend little effort in information processing (Van Hiel, Pandelaere, & Duriez, 2004, p. 8”