The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism
By B. Duriez, Alain Van Hiel. 2002
303 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98dca20adca051cce350ad9c8c7fdc3f1e45aece
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Bart Soenens
- Chris G. Sibley
- J. Duckitt
- W. Lens
- B. Duriez
- Ingrid Zakrisson
- J. Cohrs
In Sociology and Political Science
- Chris G. Sibley
- J. Duckitt
- Bart Soenens
- Maarten Vansteenkiste
- Ingrid Zakrisson
- Nazar Akrami
- B. Duriez
- J. Cohrs
Citations in the corpus
- Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Correlates of Internalization of Regulations for Religious Activities (2006, background): “Furthermore, literal thinking was found to be positively related with right-wing authoritarianism (RWA; Duriez & Van Hiel, 2002; Duriez, Van Hiel, & Kossowska, 2002), which reflects the adherence to conventional norms and values, an uncritical subjection to authority, and feelings of aggression to”
- A Dual-Process Motivational Model of Ideology, Politics, and Prejudice (2009, background): “However, this assumption was never empirically validated, or even investigated, and more recently it has been increasingly accepted that the F-scale and measures derived from it are measures of social attitudes rather than of personality (eg, Duriez & Van Hiel, 2002 ; Guimond, Dambrun, Michinov, &”
- What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, Social Dominance Orientation, or Right‐Wing Authoritarianism? (2004, background): “Further, the two scales have low (especially in North America; Altemeyer, 1998; McFarland, manuscript submitted for publication; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999; Whitley, 1999) to moderate (especially in Europe; Duriez & Van Hiel, 2002; Van Hiel & Mervielde, 2002; Zakrisson, unpublished manuscript) correlat”
- Authoritarianism, Threat, and Prejudice: An Analysis of Mediation and Moderation (2009, result): “This is consistent with suggestions by Duriez and Van Hiel ( 2002 ) that RWA-based prejudice is expressed more openly and directly.”
- Effects of Right‐Wing Authoritarianism and Threat from Terrorism on Restriction of Civil Liberties (2005, background): “SDO has been found to predict substantial amounts of variance in prejudice (e.g., Altemeyer, 1998; Duriez & Van Hiel, 2002; McFarland, 2002), support for military intervention (Cohrs, Moschner, Maes, & Kielmann, 2005a; McFarland, 2005), and restrictive attitudes toward human rights (Cohrs, Maes, K”