Explaining Conservative Beliefs and Political Preferences: A Comparison of Social Dominance Orientation and Authoritarianism

By Alain Van Hiel, Ivan Mervielde. 2002

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c3b9a90f93ac527a74a2664dbecac39358821cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The relation between personality and prejudice: a variable‐ and a person‐centred approach (2003, unknown): “…& McFarland, 2002; Lippa & Arad, 1999; McFarland, manuscript submitted for publication; McFarland & Mattern, 2002; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999; Van Hiel & Mervielde, 2002; Verkuyten & Hagendoorn, 1998; Whitley, 1999; Whitley & Ægisdottir, 2000; Whitley & Lee, 2000) have examined the relationship…”
Right–Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Differentially Moderate Intergroup Effects on Prejudice (2010, background): “24: 583–601 (2010) DOI: 10.1002/per 1981, 1996; Ekehammar et al., 2004; Pratto et al., 1994; Van Hiel & Mervielde, 2002, 2005).”
What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, Social Dominance Orientation, or Right‐Wing Authoritarianism? (2004, background): “Further, RWA has been shown to be related to biological, symbolic, aversive racism, ethnocentrism, blatant and subtle prejudice (Van Hiel & Mervielde, paper submitted for publication), modern racism (Reynolds et al., 2001), prejudice toward Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands (Verkuyten & Hagendoo”
Social Psychological Perspectives on Trump Supporters (2017, unknown): “…predict far-right-wing voting has also been repeatedly found in European research – in Belgium and France (Lubbers & Scheepers, 2002; Swyngedouw & Ivaldi, 2001; Van Hiel, 2012; Van Hiel & Mervielde, 2002), the Netherlands (Cornelis & Van Hiel, 2015) and Italy (Leone, Desimoni, & Chirumbolo, 2014).”
Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice (2007, unknown): “Research with the RWA scale supported the earlier ﬁndings by showing that it consistently predicted prejudiced attitudes to different outgroups, minorities, and other stigmatised social groups, and was a strong correlate of generalized prejudice (Altemeyer, 1998, 1996; Van Hiel & Mervielde, 2005).”
Support for Harsh Criminal Sanctions and Criminal Justice Beliefs: A Social Dominance Perspective (2006, methodology): “Pratto, 1999). This scale has been used extensively in social psychological research, and has been found to have very high-construct validity as a measure of generalized anti-egalitarianism, generalized prejudice, and support of group-based social hierarchy (see Pratto et al., 1994; Sidanius and Pra”
Construction of a short version of the right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) scale. (2005, background): “Sometimes the correlations have been moderate to high (Duriez & Van Hiel, 2002; Van Hiel & Mervielde, 2002 ) and sometimes the concepts have been only weakly to moderately related (Altemeyer, 1998; Duckitt, 2000; Sidanius & Pratto, 1999; Whitley, 1999).”
Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the need for closure scale (2011, background): “…Social Dominance Orientation (SDO; Pratto, Sidanius, Stallworth, & Malle, 1994), Subtle racism (Pettigrew & Meertens, 1995), Blatant racism (Van Hiel & Mervielde, 2002; based on Billiet & De Witte, 1991), Essentialist Entitativity beliefs (Roets & Van Hiel, in press), Need for Cognitive…”