W. Bruine de Bruin

Cognitive Neuroscience · 2007–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 57 researchers and is trusted by 25 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Cognitive Neuroscience — 70 citations into it; #6,459 of 10,852 by trust here, #6,526 by citations
• General Decision Sciences — 58 citations into it; #252 of 1,995 by trust here, #236 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 48 citations into it
• Sociology and Political Science — 45 citations into it; #15,784 of 22,756 by trust here, #4,364 by citations
• Economics and Econometrics — 38 citations into it
• Statistics and Probability — 25 citations into it
• Social Psychology — 22 citations into it
• Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law — 21 citations into it; #1,581 of 2,821 by trust here, #425 by citations

Whom W. Bruine de Bruin trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. J. Baron
2. D. Streiner
3. Daniel Kahneman
4. Naomi P. Friedman
5. Anna Lusardi
6. Amos Tversky
7. Baruch Fischhoff
8. Robyn A LeBoeuf
9. Gerd Gigerenzer
10. K. Stanovich

Who trusts W. Bruine de Bruin overall

1. Heather Butler
2. Baruch Fischhoff
3. F. Del Missier
4. Wiebke Eberhardt
5. Kirstin C Appelt
6. Andrew M. Parker
7. K. Stanovich
8. Olivier Armantier
9. Timo Mäntylä
10. M. Toplak

Papers from W. Bruine de Bruin's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers W. Bruine de Bruin trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice
2. Rational choice and the framing of decisions
3. Exploring the Central Executive
4. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. (Cognitive Psychology)
5. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. (American Psychologist)
6. Perception of risk.
7. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Gone with the wind: Individual differences in heuristics and biases undermine the implication of
8. A New Look at Framing Effects: Distribution of Effect Sizes, Individual Differences, and Independence of Types of Effects
9. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. (Psychological methods)
10. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.

Their papers

• Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings (2010) — 702 citations
• Measuring Inflation Expectations (2013) — 114 citations
• Expectations of Inflation: The Role of Demographic Variables, Expectation Formation, and Financial Literacy (2010) — 177 citations
• Preferences for change: Do individuals prefer voluntary actions, soft regulations, or hard regulations to decrease fossil fuel consumption? (2009) — 137 citations
• Preparing for smart grid technologies: A behavioral decision research approach to understanding consumer expectations about smart meters (2012) — 244 citations
• Age differences in financial decision making: T he benefits of more experience and less negative emotions (2018) — 93 citations
• Public perception of climate risk and adaptation in the UK: A review of the literature (2014) — 187 citations
• Decision-making Competence, Executive Functioning, and General Cognitive Abilities (2012) — 258 citations
• Explaining adult age differences in decision‐making competence (2012) — 223 citations
• Executive functions in decision making: An individual differences approach (2010) — 155 citations
• Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. (2007) — 927 citations
• Maximizers versus satisficers: Decision-making styles, competence, and outcomes (2007) — 277 citations