Executive functions in decision making: An individual differences approach

By F. Del Missier, Timo Mäntylä, W. Bruine de Bruin. 2010

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57e4e4b7117db5ad63e9dcd9e0fe36d120ff672c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. K. Stanovich
2. M. Toplak
3. R. F. West
4. F. Del Missier
5. Timo Mäntylä
6. W. Bruine de Bruin
7. Michel J. J. Handgraaf
8. Elke U. Weber

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. M. Toplak
2. W. Bruine de Bruin
3. Timo Mäntylä
4. F. Del Missier
5. R. F. West
6. Elke U. Weber
7. K. Stanovich
8. Scott Barry Kaufman

In General Decision Sciences

1. M. Toplak
2. K. Stanovich
3. F. Del Missier
4. Timo Mäntylä
5. W. Bruine de Bruin
6. R. F. West
7. Elke U. Weber
8. Michel J. J. Handgraaf

Citations in the corpus

• Decision-making Competence, Executive Functioning, and General Cognitive Abilities (2012, methodology): “More importantly, it is likely that different decision‐making tasks require the involvement of different kinds of control processes (see, e.g. Castellanos, Sonuga‐Barke, Milham, & Tannock, 2006; Del Missier et al., 2010; Krain et al., 2006).”
• The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011, result): “These results converge with a body of other work indicating that the susceptibility to these biases varies considerably (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007 ;C okely & Kelley, 2009; Del Missier, Mantyla, & Bruine de Bruine, 2010; Dohmen, Falk, Huffman, Marklein, & Sunde, 2009; Klaczynski, 2001; Oechssler”
• Decision-making styles and their associations with decision-making competencies and mental health (2015, background): “Since then, a Swedish (Marklund, 2008), Italian (Del Missier et al., 2010) and Slovak version (Bavol’ár, 2013) have also been introduced.”
• The Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research (2011, methodology): “…is particularly promising because of the reliability and external validity of its components and because of evidence showing a link between executive functioning and elements of decision making competence (i.e., applying decision rules and consistency in risk perception) (Del Missier et al., 2010).”