Preferences for change: Do individuals prefer voluntary actions, soft regulations, or hard regulations to decrease fossil fuel consumption?
By Shahzeen Z. Attari, Mary E. Schoen, Cliff I. Davidson, M. DeKay, W. Bruine de Bruin, Robyn M. Dawes, Mitchell J. Small. 2009
137 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d171329ad7947a3e64cffdde68993474028435ff
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh
- Todd L. Cherry
- Christian Schubert
- Stephan Kroll
- Steffen Kallbekken
- Stefan Drews
Citations in the corpus
- What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies (2016, background): “…2006; McCright, 2008; McCright et al., 2013a, 2013b; Park & Vedlitz, 2013; Zhao, Leiserowitz, Maibach, & Roser-Renouf, 2011), although a few studies (with notably smaller samples) report insignificant effects for these variables (Attari et al., 2009; Shwom, Bidwell, Dan, & Dietz, 2010).”
- The acceptability of efficiency-enhancing environmental taxes, subsidies and regulation: An experimental investigation (2012, background): “when the instrument is viewed as coercive (Attari et al., 2009; Baron and Jurney, 1993; Jakobsson et al., 2000; Steg et al., 2006).”
- Green nudges: Do they work? Are they ethical? (2016, background): “…in general (Tannenbaum et al., 2014), which, in our present context, is reflected in the observation that sometimes, people generally in favor of a pro-environmental agenda are more supportive and responsive to green nudges than people not so predisposed (Attari et al., 2009; Costa and Kahn, 2013).”