Kostas Kampourakis

History and Philosophy of Science · 2007–2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 17 researchers and is trusted by 12 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• History and Philosophy of Science — 33 citations into it; #133 of 602 by trust here, #180 by citations
• Education — 30 citations into it; #1,810 of 11,309 by trust here, #4,981 by citations
• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 19 citations into it; #3,046 of 8,223 by trust here, #7,501 by citations
• Social Psychology — 14 citations into it; #4,085 of 15,694 by trust here, #9,333 by citations
• Molecular Biology — 6 citations into it
• Astronomy and Astrophysics — 5 citations into it

Whom Kostas Kampourakis trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Michael Strevens
2. Susan Carey
3. André Ariew
4. Tania Lombrozo
5. Cynthia Passmore
6. Vasso Zogza
7. Ernst Mayr
8. R. Khishfe
9. Sherry A. Southerland
10. Clark Glymour

Who trusts Kostas Kampourakis overall

1. T. Gregory
2. Mike U. Smith
3. Ebru Kaya
4. John E Opfer
5. Vasso Zogza
6. Ross H. Nehm
7. S. Erduran
8. E. Evans
9. Busra Aksoz
10. Minsu Ha

Papers from Kostas Kampourakis's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Kostas Kampourakis trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory
2. Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution
3. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation
4. Development and Evaluation of the Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection
5. Functional explanation and the function of explanation.
6. Understanding students' explanations of biological phenomena: Conceptual frameworks or p‐prims?
7. Knowing, Believing, and Understanding: What Goals for Science Education?
8. Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations
9. How is Biological Explanation Possible? (British Journal for the Philosophy of Science)
10. Science Education as Conceptual Change

Their papers

• Students’ Preconceptions About Evolution: How Accurate is the Characterization as “Lamarckian” when Considering the History of Evolutionary Thought? (2007) — 93 citations
• Preliminary Evolutionary Explanations: A Basic Framework for Conceptual Change and Explanatory Coherence in Evolution (2009) — 116 citations
• Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations (2008) — 136 citations
• The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science (2016) — 210 citations