Matthew C. Makel

Statistics and Probability · 2010–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 12 researchers and is trusted by 9 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Matthew C. Makel trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Daniele Fanelli
  2. John P. A. Ioannidis
  3. R. Rosenthal
  4. Harold Pashler
  5. D. Bem
  6. Joseph P. Simmons
  7. L.
  8. Valen E. Johnson
  9. Leslie K. John
  10. Roger D. Peng

Who trusts Matthew C. Makel overall

  1. E. Marsden
  2. Bryan G. Cook
  3. Phillip Dawson
  4. K. Morgan‐Short
  5. S. Ceci
  6. Michael D. Coyne
  7. Hugues Lortie-Forgues
  8. Joni M. Lakin
  9. K. Leithwood
  10. S. Thompson

Papers from Matthew C. Makel's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Matthew C. Makel trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
  2. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known
  3. Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined (Perspectives on Psychological Science)
  4. Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project
  5. Reproducible Research in Computational Science (Science)
  6. False-Positive Psychology (Psychology Science)
  7. Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
  8. The Replication Recipe: What Makes for a Convincing Replication?
  9. “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences (PLoS ONE)
  10. Fearing the Future of Empirical Psychology: Bem's (2011) Evidence of Psi as a Case Study of Deficiencies in Modal Research Practice (Review of General Psychology)

Their papers