Phillip Dawson

Education · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · 2014–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 41 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Phillip Dawson trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. D. Carless
  2. A. Jonsson
  3. David Boud
  4. Y. M. Reddy
  5. Heidi L. Andrade
  6. N. Winstone
  7. Ernesto Panadero
  8. Gunilla Svingby
  9. Hoi Kwan Ning
  10. Dorothy A. Cheng

Who trusts Phillip Dawson overall

  1. David Boud
  2. Martin Stigmar
  3. Ernesto Panadero
  4. Monika Hooda
  5. Sin Wang Chong
  6. D. Carless

Papers from Phillip Dawson's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Phillip Dawson trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice
  2. Differing perceptions in the feedback process
  3. Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal
  4. The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment
  5. Getting the Message Across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback
  6. From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education
  7. Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
  8. The Power of Feedback
  9. Comments on Essays: Do students understand what tutors write?
  10. The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes

Their papers