C. Godfrey

General Health Professions · 2014–2022

A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom C. Godfrey trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Z. Munn
  2. K. Davis
  3. H. Arksey

Who trusts C. Godfrey overall

  1. F. M. Van der Kleij
  2. Andrea C. Tricco
  3. Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
  4. M. Peters

Papers from C. Godfrey's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers C. Godfrey trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. (Health Information and Libraries Journal)
  2. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
  3. Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (PLoS Medicine)
  4. What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. (International Journal of Nursing Studies)
  5. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (Implementation science : IS)
  6. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
  7. The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI) (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
  8. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
  9. 診断精度研究のバイアスリスク評価ツールQUADAS－2：a Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 の活用
  10. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (BMC Medical Research Methodology)

Their papers