Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach
By E. Aromataris, R. Fernandez, C. Godfrey, C. Holly, H. Khalil, P. Tungpunkom. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 2015
2,061 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/783c173b55d2f2371fcc6b9f9eae9dabf094169a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Coffee consumption and health: umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomes (2017, background): “11 We conducted a review of coffee consumption and multiple health outcomes by systematically searching for meta-analyses in which coffee consumption was all or part of the exposure of interest or where coffee consumption had been part of a subgroup analysis.”
- Mental health outcomes of quarantine and isolation for infection prevention: a systematic umbrella review of the global evidence (2020, methodology): “In this umbrella review, we followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and the recommendations by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Umbrella Review Methodology Working Group [21,30].”
- What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018, background): “These include integrative reviews, scoping reviews [47], evidence maps [48], realist syntheses [49], rapid reviews [50], umbrella reviews (systematic reviews of reviews) [51], mixed methods reviews [52], concept analyses [53] and others.”