Rob M. A. Nelissen

Sociology and Political Science · 2007–2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 25 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 52 citations into it; #8,110 of 22,756 by trust here, #13,305 by citations
• Social Psychology — 27 citations into it; #5,907 of 15,694 by trust here, #5,305 by citations
• Safety Research — 24 citations into it; #4,485 of 5,829 by trust here, #5,591 by citations
• Cognitive Neuroscience — 17 citations into it; #4,244 of 10,852 by trust here, #3,051 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 15 citations into it; #8,804 of 9,731 by trust here, #5,054 by citations
• Applied Psychology — 5 citations into it
• Demography — 5 citations into it
• Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics — 5 citations into it

Whom Rob M. A. Nelissen trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Ernst Fehr
2. Robert Trivers
3. Pat Barclay
4. M. Zeelenberg
5. Martin A. Nowak
6. R. May
7. Lee Cronk
8. Michael Gurven
9. Urs Fischbacher
10. Joseph Henrich

Who trusts Rob M. A. Nelissen overall

1. M. Zeelenberg
2. Ilona E. de Hooge
3. E. Smith
4. Tobias Brosch
5. Seger M. Breugelmans
6. L. Shrum
7. Pat Barclay
8. Thomas Allard
9. J. van Doorn
10. Martin K. Patel

Papers from Rob M. A. Nelissen's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Rob M. A. Nelissen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
2. Altruistic punishment in humans (Nature)
3. The evolution of cooperation
4. The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. (Evolution and human behavior)
5. Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice
6. Adaptation and Natural Selection. (Book Reviews: Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought)
7. Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology)
8. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. (Psychological methods)
9. The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game (Science)
10. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models (Behavoir research methods, instruments & computers)

Their papers

• Emotions and goals: Assessing relations between values and emotions (2007) — 100 citations
• How to turn a hawk into a dove and vice versa: Interactions between emotions and goals in a give-some dilemma game (2007) — 117 citations
• On emotion specificity in decision making: Why feeling is for doing (2008) — 411 citations
• Moral emotions as determinants of third-party punishment: Anger, guilt, and the functions of altruistic sanctions (2009) — 208 citations
• The price you pay: cost-dependent reputation effects of altruistic punishment (2008) — 118 citations
• Social benefits of luxury brands as costly signals of wealth and status (2011) — 449 citations