Shanti D. Agung

Management of Technology and Innovation · 2007

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 17 researchers and is trusted by 15 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Shanti D. Agung trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Donald S. Siegel
  2. Scott A. Shane
  3. Andy Lockett
  4. David C. Mowery
  5. Mike Wright
  6. Jerry G. Thursby
  7. Albert N. Link
  8. Jason Owen-Smith
  9. Peter Lindelöf
  10. Bhaven N. Sampat

Who trusts Shanti D. Agung overall

  1. Christopher S. Hayter
  2. Serguey Braguinsky
  3. Markus Perkmann
  4. Hans K. Hvide
  5. A. Muscio
  6. Samantha R. Bradley
  7. Marcel Hülsbeck
  8. Christoph Grimpe
  9. Massimo G. Colombo

Papers from Shanti D. Agung's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Shanti D. Agung trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Objectives, Characteristics and Outcomes of University Licensing: A Survey of Major U.S. Universities
  2. Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT (Management Sciences)
  3. Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing
  4. Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States
  5. Spinning Out New Ventures: A Typology of Incubation Strategies from European Research Institutions
  6. Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities (Management Sciences)
  7. University Technology Transfer: Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter?
  8. Science Parks and the Performance of New Technology-Based Firms: A Review of Recent U.K. Evidence and an Agenda for Future Research
  9. The changing composition of innovative activity in the US -- a portrait based on patent analysis
  10. When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive?

Their papers