Spinning Out New Ventures: A Typology of Incubation Strategies from European Research Institutions
By Bart Clarysse, Mike Wright, Andy Lockett, Els Van de Velde, A. Vohora. 2005
856 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e03682a43d0354b8a768e735ea60f8b195609a4e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Mike Wright
- Christopher S. Hayter
- Silvio Vismara
- Einar Rasmussen
- Maribel Guerrero
- David Urbano
- Massimo G. Colombo
- Donald S. Siegel
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Christopher S. Hayter
- Mike Wright
- David Urbano
- Maribel Guerrero
- Einar Rasmussen
- Donald S. Siegel
- Silvio Vismara
- Frank J. van Rijnsoever
In Strategy and Management
- Mike Wright
- Christopher S. Hayter
- David Urbano
- Maribel Guerrero
- Igor Filatotchev
- Albert N. Link
- Massimo G. Colombo
- Donald S. Siegel
Citations in the corpus
- Dynamics of Science-based entrepreneurship (2010, background): “In one of the few empirical studies in this area, Clarysse et al. (2007) examine the determinants of board composition in high tech start-ups and highlight the tensions that exist between the founding team and other stakeholders in determining board composition.”
- Explaining incubators using firm analogy (2009, methodology): “Clarysse et al. (2005) found three different incubation models based on the activities and resources used and von Zedtwitz and Grimaldi (2006) found five types of incubators based on the management of the core services.”
- Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities (2005, background): “…refer to the spinoff strategies of different European public research-based institutions (Klofsten and Jones-Evans, 2000; Davenport et al., 2002; Clarysse et al., 2005), the case of Massachusetts Institute of Techn d M - i side t nt, 1 ene the U ant s nomi ies ( 004 A gy M ic i uted 2 offs c…”
- University spin-off policies and economic development in Less successful regions: Learning from two decades of policy practice (2005, background): “Although Clarysse et al. (2004) suggest that this implies universities should—in that situation—focus on technical-based spin-offs, this does raise the question of whether there are policy instruments which could target promoting the types of business service firms which are most likely to remain…”
- Pathways to impact and the strategic role of universities: new evidence on the breadth and depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK and the factors constraining its development (2012, neutral): “…established body of literature that has evaluated the impact of aspects of the technology transfer process, including: academic spin-off activities (Clarysse et al 2005; DiGregorio and Shane, 2003; Krabel and Muller 2009; Landry et al, 2006; O'Shea et al 2005 and 2008); university licensing…”
- The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change - Key strategic challenges (2019, background): “Many universities aiming to develop academic spinoffs do not invest in sufficient resources and capabilities to match their aspirations (Clarysse et al. 2005), underestimating what is required to take innovations from the lab to market.”
- Strengthening science, technology, and innovation-based incubators to help achieve Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons from India (2020, neutral): “, 2014), the underlying goals under which a specific incubator was set up (Bergek and Norrman, 2008), and the different incubation strategies or incubation business models applied in relation to various goals (Clarysse et al., 2005; Grimaldi and Grandi, 2005).”
- Incubator best practice: A framework (2008, background): “These approaches have some common features with the different ‘‘models of spinout activities’’ discussed by Clarysse et al. (2005).”
- The research university, entrepreneurship and regional development: Research propositions and current evidence (2012, background): “The formulation of a selective incubation strategy for spin-offs (Degroof and Roberts 2004; Clarysse et al. 2005) and the development of relationships among academics, TTO personnel and investors (Wright et al.”
- The development, growth, and performance of university spin-offs: a critical review (2019, background): “First, the parent institution is typically assumed to be a university, while academic research is also undertaken by public research institutes (PRIs) (Moray and Clarysse, 2005).”
- The Evolution of Business Incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations (2012, background): “Previous work has already assessed different strategies to incubate new ventures (e.g. Clarysse et al., 2005).”