Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities

By Maryann P. Feldman, I. Feller, Janet E. L. Bercovitz, Richard M. Burton. Management Sciences, 2002

453 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb8fdbd27db8a688f5918400f3d0073b569e5796

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Finance

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

International Scientist Mobility and the Locus of Knowledge and Technology Transfer (2011, background): “Formal KTT usually involves a legal instrument like a patent, license, or royalty agreement (Bozeman, 2000; Feldman et al., 2002; Thursby and Thursby, 2002).”
University Start-Up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms that Go Public: A Resource-Based View of Academic Entrepreneurship (2005, methodology): “From their interviews with TTO personnel, Feldman et al. (2002) learned that the perception of equity is no longer negative.”
Beneath the tip of the iceberg: exploring the multiple forms of university–industry linkages (2011, unknown): “…based on US observations investigating the patterns of diffusion of inventions via patenting and IPR (among others: Thursby and Thursby 2002; Feldman et al. 2002; Di Gregorio and Shane 2003; Friedman and Silberman 2003; Bercovitz and Feldman 2004). many of the collaborative activities are…”
Conceptualizing academic entrepreneurship ecosystems: a review, analysis and extension of the literature (2018, background): “…2015; Kolympiris and Klein 2017; Markman et al. 2005a), its age (Kolympiris and Klein 2017; Powers and McDougall 2005b), its hiring and compensation practices (Markman et al. 2004; Siegel et al. 2003; Swamidass and Vulasa 2009), as well as its equity involvement in spinoffs (Feldman et al. 2002).”
The character of innovative places: entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity (2014, background): “Universities can certainly enact policies to promote entrepreneurship (Bercovitz et al. 2001; Feldman et al. 2002).”
Entrepreneurship from the Ivory Tower: Do Incentive Systems Matter? (2004, background): “For example, research universities play an important role in the development of radically new technologies (Nerkar and Shane, in press; Rosenberg and Nelson, 1994) and new ventures exploit and deploy university inventions (DiGregorio and Shane, 2003; Feldman et al., 2002 ).”
The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity (2003, background): “Several recent studies have emphasized the role of the technology licensing office as both a locus for organizational learning about technology transfer (Feldman et al., 2002; Owen-Smith, 2003), and an important factor in licensing success (Siegel et al., 2000; Kaghan, 2001).”
University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature (2007, background): “For example, the process of choosing among various commercialization strategies in a discriminating fashion is an internal procedure that has drawn considerable attention in recent years (Bray and Lee, 2000; Meseri and Maital, 2001; Feldman et al., 2002; Shane 2002a).”
Entpreprenerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development (2006, background): “American universities have also experimented with taking equity in lieu of traditional licensing fees (Feldman et al., 2002).”