Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT

By Ajay Agrawal, Rebecca Henderson. Management Sciences, 2002

1,067 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/261fa5361ab6b55992eade89bc32f5ecead21180

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? (2007, methodology): “commercialisation of intellectual property rights ( Agrawal and Henderson, 2002; ”
Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? (2004, neutral): “Olivastro, & Hamilton, 2001; Mowery, Nelson, Sampat, & Ziedonis, 2001; Spencer, 2001; Agrawal & Henderson, 2002 ).”
The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford (2004, background): “With the prominent exceptions of Agrawal and Henderson (2002), and Mansfield (1995), little research has been done.”
Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany (2011, background): “Notably, scientists’ formal TT participation is highly skewed (Agrawal and Henderson, 2002; Giuri et al., 2007).”
Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level (2008, background): “We have been told that the MIT electrical engineering department values a patent as much as an academic article in a high-quality journal, although there does not appear to be any quantification of these trade-offs at the two universities examined here ( Agrawal and Henderson 2002 ).”
Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry (2011, positive): “However, a number of both quantitative and qualitative studies suggest consulting is a widespread practice among academic researchers, with most authors finding a positive relationship between faculty quality and consulting engagement (Boyer and Lewis, 1984; Louis et al., 1989; Agrawal and Henderson”
Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities (2005, background): “Third, while a number of studies have investigated knowledge flow effects from universities to industry (Agrawal and Henderson, 2002; Siegel et al., 2003a,b) and university technology transfer performance (Henderson et al., 1998; Thursby and Kemp, 2002; Siegel et al., 2003a,b; Chapple et al.,…”
The Dynamics of the Transfer and Renewal of Patents (2008, background): “Schmookler [44], Scherer [45], Griliches [20], Pakes and Schankerman [37], Schankerman and Pakes [42], Pakes [36], Tratjenberg [49], Jaffe, Henderson and Tratjenberg [25], Putnam [40], Lanjouw [30], Schankerman [43] Harhoff, Narin, Scherer and Vopel [23], Lanjouw and Schankerman [31], Hall, Jaffe an”
Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry (2008, background): “In this view, consulting differs from other university-industry relationships in that it mobilizes expertise that is 6 commonly held within academic communities (Agrawal and Henderson, 2002).”
Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-Commons Hypothesis (2007, neutral): “While we do not undertake a detailed analysis of the determinants of patenting behavior (as explored by, among others, Azoulay et al., 2007; Ding et al., 2006; Markiewicz and DiMinin, 2005; Agrawal and Henderson, 2002), our analysis of the”
Gender Patterns of Research and Licensing Activity of Science and Engineering Faculty (2005, background): “The Act was intended, not to redirect faculty research, but rather to facilitate industrial application of university research. requires, not only further development, but also faculty cooperation in that development (Thursby et al. (2001), Agrawal and Henderson (2002), Thursby and Thursby (2002)).”