University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature

By Frank T. Rothaermel, Shanti D. Agung, Lin Jiang. 2007

1,669 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/30de6562cc2110bf8fe8e687c8953441b75f2ead

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Entrepreneurship education and training as facilitators of regional development: A systematic literature review (2017, background): “What has happened is that more and more universities have played a strategic and fundamental role in regional development (Bramwell and Wolfe, 2008) by contributing to the transfer of research to enterprises, contributing to entrepreneurship education or supporting the process of setting up business”
Knowledge Transfer in University Quadruple Helix Ecosystems: An Absorptive Capacity Perspective (2016, neutral): “This view suggests that whilst government strategy and programmes are encouraging quadruple helix collaboration, a mismatch between objectives and realities of innovation which does not follow linear timescales may impede KT and innovation success (Rothaermel et al., 2007; Miller et al, 2014).”
Dynamics of Science-based entrepreneurship (2010, background): “tutional and other influences on the creation of SBEFs (for reviews see for example, Mustar et al. 2006; Rothermael et al. 2007; Siegel et al. 2007), and numerous special issues have been devoted to entrepreneurship and university technology transfer (e.”
Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model (2009, background): “As Etzkowitz (2002), Rothaermel et al. (2007), and Shane (2004) have shown, university-industry relationships and academic entrepreneurship is a burgeoning field of research, though there has been less research on alternative models for organizing the commercialization of university inventions.”
Institutions and Venture Capital (2013, background): “See Skedinger (2010) for an overview of the effects of employment protection legislations.”
What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy (2010, background): “Despite, divergences of opinion about what constitutes a viable indicator of TTO performance (Rothaermel et al. 2007), many countries have conducted assessments of TTOs’ efficiency.”
Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university's structural configuration on third mission performance (2019, background): “The ‘entrepreneurial university’ model has been presented then as the next logical step in the university system's natural evolution (Rothaermel et al., 2007) responding by focusing on outreach activities upon generating technology transfer and knowledge based start-ups (Audretsch, 2014), while Godd”
Categories of university-level entrepreneurship: a literature survey (2010, background): “Etzkowitz et al. 2000; Sporn 2001; Etzkowitz 2004; Kirby 2006; Rothaermel et al. 2007 ), several key elements have been listed in Table 2. These key elements should provide a basis for the identification of factors or antecedents which may determine or influence university-level entrepreneurial act”