The changing composition of innovative activity in the US -- a portrait based on patent analysis

By Diana Hicks, Tony Breitzman, D. Olivastro, Kimberly S. Hamilton. 2001

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8bda4ecfeeb82dd0a40a0d236c2a026e01330bbd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Measuring Knowledge Spillovers: What Patents, Licenses and Publications Reveal About Innovation Diffusion (2009, background): “(For discussion of patent citations to publications, see also Hicks et al., 2001; Narin et al., 1997.)”
University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda (2007, unknown): “While there is already a considerable body of research on IP commercialisation, including university patenting (Hicks et al. 2001; Thursby and Thursby 2002) and licensing (Bercovitz et al. 2001; Jensen and Thursby 2001; Thursby and Thursby 2004), the literature on relationships is less consolidated.”
Universities and Fundamental Research: Reflections on the Growth of University–Industry Partnerships (2002, background): “See also Hicks et al. (2001) for further evidence on the growth of U.”
Universities in National Innovation Systems (2006, background): “Recent work by Hicks et al. (2001) similarly indicates that patents filed by U.”
Are patenting scientists the better scholars?: An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology (2006, background): “Hicks et al. (2004) support this point with their patent citation data; work in basic journals is the most frequently cited in both patents and papers, with Science and Nature being the leading journals.”
Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? (2004, unknown): “Section 6contains a discussio nd a conclusion. ockburn and Henderson, 1998; Henderson e 998; Mansfield, 1998; Meyer-Krahmer and Schmo 998; Zucker et al., 1998; Hicks et al., 2001; Mow t al., 2001; Spencer, 2001; Agrawal and Hender 002).”
The Four Literatures of Social Science (2004, unknown): “They are also becoming more useful as more and more public sector researchers patent (Hicks et al., 2001).”
Patents and patent policy (2007, background): “I also showed that most of the growth was due to increased patenting by firms in the information and communication technology (ICT) sectors, which is consistent with the view that much of it is for defensive reasons (Arora et al., 2001; Hall and Ziedonis, 2001; Hicks et al., 2001).”
How Much Does Immigration Boost Innovation? (2009, background): “[17] Hicks, Diana, Tony Breitzman, Dominic Livastro and Kimberly Hamilton.”
In Search of Performance Effects of (In)Direct Industry Science Links (2008, background): “science in patents (Narin et al, 1997; Hicks et al, 2001 ).”
Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: lessons for less-developed countries (2003, background): “Of course, there are firms producing basic knowledge, publishing papers and advancing science (Hicks, 1995), and universities applying for patents, generating new products, etc. (Hicks et al., 2001).”
Is Academic Science Driving a Surge in Industrial Innovation? Evidence from Patent Citations (2005, unknown): “The semiconductor industry has always had strong links to science [Hicks et al., 2001, Lim, 2003], but, as Hall and Ziedonis [2001] have showed, firms in this industry began sharply increasing their patenting in the 1980s and 1990s.”