Mike Clarke

Statistics and Probability · 2005–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 20 papers; trusts 12 researchers and is trusted by 18 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Statistics and Probability — 210 citations into it; #3,107 of 12,932 by trust here, #87 by citations
General Health Professions — 80 citations into it; #1,896 of 4,781 by trust here, #33 by citations
Economics and Econometrics — 74 citations into it
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health — 55 citations into it; #808 of 2,368 by trust here, #123 by citations
Sociology and Political Science — 53 citations into it; #7,988 of 22,756 by trust here, #772 by citations

Whom Mike Clarke trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

Who trusts Mike Clarke overall

Papers from Mike Clarke's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Mike Clarke trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. (International Journal of Surgery)
Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (Statistics in Medicine)
CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (PLoS Medicine)
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. (British medical journal)

Their papers

Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2012) — 790 citations
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009) — 37,422 citations
CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008) — 615 citations
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (2014) — 1,136 citations
The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2012) — 1,395 citations
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement. (2015) — 1,945 citations
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015) — 18,904 citations
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015) — 15,705 citations
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009) — 15,061 citations
Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. (2009) — 875 citations
How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016) — 936 citations
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012) — 1,488 citations
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017) — 1,669 citations
Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011) — 1,144 citations
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. (2009) — 1,545 citations
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations (2017) — 626 citations
Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. (2014) — 1,333 citations
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2014) — 11,185 citations
questionnaires: systematic review Increasing response rates to postal (2007) — 1,545 citations
International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. (2005) — 2,567 citations