Guillaume Lamé

Statistics and Probability · 2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Guillaume Lamé trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. David Moher
  2. Arif E. Jinha
  3. A. Liberati
  4. Larissa Shamseer
  5. H. Bastian
  6. D. Gough
  7. Daniele Fanelli
  8. Mike Clarke
  9. Douglas G. Altman

Papers from Guillaume Lamé's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Guillaume Lamé trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (PLoS Medicine)
  2. What is a systematic review?
  3. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods (Systematic Reviews)
  4. How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  5. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
  6. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (Systematic Reviews)
  7. Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence (Learned Publishing)
  8. A taxonomy of circular economy indicators (Journal of Cleaner Production)
  9. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. (International Journal of Surgery)
  10. CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (PLoS Medicine)

Their papers