Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

By David Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, Douglas G. Altman. International Journal of Surgery, 2010

8,251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

QUOROM and PRISMA ask authors to report an abstract. However, PRISMA is not specific about format.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/acaed32791ba1befe97307b5fb1281102feb1577

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

The Effectiveness of Convalescent Plasma and Hyperimmune Immunoglobulin for the Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Infections of Viral Etiology: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-analysis (2014, methodology): “This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) guidelines [10].”
Healthcare Staff Wellbeing, Burnout, and Patient Safety: A Systematic Review (2016, methodology): “This review was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews andMeta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines[23], see S1 File.”
Re-revisiting Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Use: a systematic review of studies from 1998–2011 (2012, methodology): “Despite minor changes, the methods used for this review follow the PRISMA Statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews andMeta-Analyses) [19].”
Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017, background): “Results Figure 1 provides the flow diagram of articles included and excluded from the review [55].”
Parenting Factors Associated with Reduced Adolescent Alcohol Use: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies (2010, methodology): “A systematic search was conducted according to the PRISMA Statement [19].”
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. (2020, background): “In 2009, an international group of systematic reviewers, methodologists, clinicians and journal editors disseminated the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) statement, a guideline designed to help authors prepare a complete report of their systematic review (1-”
Application of Graph Theory for Identifying Connectivity Patterns in Human Brain Networks: A Systematic Review (2019, methodology): “Following the PRISMA guidelines (Moher et al., 2010), a summary of the identiﬁcation, screening, and selection of studies for inclusion in this review is displayed in Figure 6 .”
Guidelines and recommendations for ensuring Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP): a guideline developed by the German Society for Epidemiology (2019, methodology): “Selected relevant recommendations for epidemiological studies are the STROBE Statement [53], the STROBE-ME Statement [54], the RECORD Statement [50], STROSA [57] and the PRISMA Statement [51].”
The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on child and adolescent mental health: systematic review (2021, positive): “Methods The format of the methods and results was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) guidelines [70] (eTable 1) (study protocol registered on PROSPERO: CRD42021225604).”
Systematic review and meta-analysis of AI-based conversational agents for promoting mental health and well-being (2023, methodology): “The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO, CRD 42023392187, and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses 74 (Supplementary Table 9).”
A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016, neutral): “Currently, a checklist for reporting scoping reviews in the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health Research (EQUATOR) library does not exist for health research [11].”
Applications of Machine Learning in Human Microbiome Studies: A Review on Feature Selection, Biomarker Identification, Disease Prediction and Treatment (2021, methodology): “An example of such thorough review guidelines is Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) for systematic reviews in healthcare (Moher et al., 2010).”