J. McKenzie

Statistics and Probability · British medical journal · 2018–2022

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom J. McKenzie trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. David Moher
  2. Matthew J. Page
  3. Douglas G. Altman
  4. A. Liberati
  5. Larissa Shamseer
  6. J. Tetzlaff
  7. S. Brennan
  8. K. F. Schulz
  9. Mike Clarke
  10. L. Stewart

Who trusts J. McKenzie overall

  1. Matthew J. Page
  2. Patrick M. M. Bossuyt
  3. J. Yepes‐Nuñez
  4. I. Boutron
  5. Tammy Hoffmann

Papers from J. McKenzie's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. McKenzie trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (Systematic Reviews)
  2. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  3. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (British medical journal)
  4. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
  5. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (Journal of the Medical Library Association)
  6. Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (Nature)
  7. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
  8. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline (British medical journal)
  9. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
  10. Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PLoS ONE)

Their papers