A. Chan
Statistics and Probability · British medical journal · 2004–2020
A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 69 citations into it; #5,273 of 12,932 by trust here, #309 by citations
Whom A. Chan trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts A. Chan overall
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- Douglas G. Altman
- David Moher
- K. F. Schulz
- Daniele Fanelli
- J. Polanin
- Luke Plonsky
- J. Gurevitch
- Sally Hopewell
- Joshua Carp
Papers from A. Chan's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers A. Chan trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant
- Observational studies analyzed like randomized experiments: an application to postmenopausal hormone therapy and coronary heart disease (Epidemiology)
- Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available. (American Journal of Epidemiology)
- Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
- GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research (British medical journal)
- Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. (Value in Health)
- Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
- Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method (Implementation science : IS)
- Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (Psychometrika)
Their papers
- Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. (2004) — 1,810 citations
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008) — 1,504 citations
- Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014) — 8,871 citations
- SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2013) — 6,010 citations
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016) — 17,786 citations
- SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013) — 5,077 citations
- Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI Extension (2020) — 1,148 citations
- Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension (2020) — 33 citations
- Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO Extension (2018) — 679 citations
- Research: increasing value, reducing waste 4 Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research (2014) — 722 citations