GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

By G. Guyatt, Andrew D. Oxman, G. Vist, Regina Kunz, Y. Falck-Ytter, P. Alonso-Coello, Holger J. Schünemann. British medical journal, 2008

15,278 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8da686b777ef41e017a94fc4529add7342a0f5ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series (2018, background): “However, we would argue that the accessibility and transparency of this approach outweigh its limitations [40].”
Work engagement interventions can be effective: a systematic review (2019, result): “According to GRADE (Guyatt et al., 2008), five factors can cause the quality of evidence to be downgraded: i) study limitations such as lack of group allocation concealment, lack of blinding, low response rates, or high attrition rates; ii) inconsistent results across studies, for examplewhere some…”
Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. (2016, methodology): “Evidence Review: The GRADE Method GRADE is a systematic approach to guideline development that has been described in detail elsewhere [2, 3].”
Guidelines on eosinophilic esophagitis: evidence-based statements and recommendations for diagnosis and management in children and adults (2017, methodology): “The use of GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) technology has been recommended in recent years as a standard tool for the development of clinical practice guides.(8) The present guide is the first one developed in EoE using this methodology.”
Empirically Supported Treatment: Recommendations for a New Model (2015, methodology): “…appraisal of the evidence, using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system (Atkins et al., 2004; Guyatt et al., 2006, 2008) to assess the quality of relevant evidence and degree to which beneﬁts are established in excess of potential harms.”