J. Gagnier

Statistics and Probability · 2008–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom J. Gagnier trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. David Moher
  2. K. F. Schulz
  3. Douglas G. Altman
  4. Sally Hopewell
  5. E. von Elm
  6. Mike Clarke
  7. A. Liberati
  8. J. Tetzlaff

Who trusts J. Gagnier overall

  1. R. Agha
  2. David Riley

Papers from J. Gagnier's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Gagnier trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
  2. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (British medical journal)
  3. CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (PLoS Medicine)
  4. The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Report Guideline Development (Journal of Dietary Supplements)
  5. Assessing the Probability That a Positive Report is False: An Approach for Molecular Epidemiology Studies
  6. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials (Obstetrics and Gynecology)
  7. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
  8. Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (PLoS Medicine)
  9. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (British medical journal)
  10. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)

Their papers