Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

By David Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, Douglas G. Altman, Gerd Antes, David Atkins, Virginia Barbour, N. Barrowman, J. A. Berlin, J. Clark and 28 more. 2014

11,185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4479cd22d28a44d699f4e1b3820cfad52f784402

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Epidemiology, causes, clinical manifestation and diagnosis, prevention and control of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during the early outbreak period: a scoping review (2020, unknown): “Figure 1 presents a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) flow diagram showing the process of searching and selecting the research articles [11].”
Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis (2016, methodology): “Fig 1 | PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process [42] SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS”
Healthy dietary indices and risk of depressive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (2018, methodology): “Methods This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and MetaAnalyses statement [22] and was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (# CRD42017080579 at www.”
The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2014, methodology): “Methods We adhered to recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement [44,45], including developing the protocol before undertaking the analysis.”
Scoping reviews: the PAGER framework for improving the quality of reporting (2021, unknown): “This is most typically in the form of the well-utilised PRISMA Flow Diagram (Moher et al., 2009).”
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019, methodology): “Flowchart of our retrieval process based on the PRISMA template for systematic reviews 36 .”
Trauma-Informed Positive Education: Using Positive Psychology to Strengthen Vulnerable Students (2016, unknown): “…(i.e., examining the relationship between codes, categorizing codes, and matching themes back to data), and selective coding (i.e., identifying the major subthemes to structure the framework) procedures based on the explicit aims stated by the authors in the peerreviewed papers (Moher et al. 2009).”
Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022, unknown): “Table 1 maps the recommended items for a scoping review protocol onto the PRISMA-P and explains where specific adjustments may be made for scoping review protocols.(20,21) Depending on whether the protocol is submitted for publication in a journal or hosted elsewhere, such as Open Science Framework,”
Prevalence of anxiety symptoms and disorders in the transgender population: A systematic review of the literature (2017, unknown): “The systematic review adheres to the guidelines detailed in the PRISMA statement (Moher et al., 2009).”
Effects of Different Exercise Interventions on Risk of Falls, Gait Ability, and Balance in Physically Frail Older Adults: A Systematic Review (2013, unknown): “This systematic review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement.(22)”
Gender Differences in Attitudes to Vegans/Vegetarians and Their Food Preferences, and Their Implications for Promoting Sustainable Dietary Patterns–A Systematic Review (2020, unknown): “Diagram showing the screening process based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) - [34].”
What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. (2014, unknown): “Diagram of the study selection process according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.(12,43) CINAHL, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; PBSC, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection; PROMs, patient-reported outcome measures.”