Scott E. Lewis

Education · 2005–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Education — 22 citations into it; #4,263 of 11,309 by trust here, #6,317 by citations
• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 16 citations into it; #3,189 of 8,223 by trust here, #4,815 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 10 citations into it
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 5 citations into it

Whom Scott E. Lewis trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. P. Lachenbruch
2. W. Viechtbauer
3. Kemal Doymuş
4. Georgios Tsaparlis
5. Mark Lipsey
6. Joseph D. Novak
7. Michael Shayer
8. Debasis Sengupta
9. S. Freeman
10. Bryan G. Cook

Who trusts Scott E. Lewis overall

1. Michelle J. Barthlow
2. Xiaoying Xu
3. J. Lewis
4. S. Watson
5. Susan Rundell Singer
6. Jenine R. Maeyer
7. J. Kampmeier
8. Miray Tekkumru‐Kisa
9. Ian J. Quitadamo

Papers from Scott E. Lewis's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Scott E. Lewis trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)
2. Departing from Lectures: An Evaluation of a Peer-Led Guided Inquiry Alternative
3. Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom
4. Practical Meta-Analysis
5. Relationships between selective cognitive variables and students' ability to solve chemistry problems
6. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
7. A Model of Problem Solving: Its Operation, Validity, and Usefulness in the Case of Organic-Synthesis Problems.
8. Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
9. Not just Piaget; not just Vygotsky, and certainly not Vygotsky as alternative to Piaget
10. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)

Their papers

• Evaluating the evidence base for evidence‐based instructional practices in chemistry through meta‐analysis (2020) — 55 citations
• Predicting at-risk students in general chemistry: comparing formal thought to a general achievement measure (2007) — 108 citations
• Departing from Lectures: An Evaluation of a Peer-Led Guided Inquiry Alternative (2005) — 272 citations